Canine Degenerative Myelopathy, also referred to as CDM or DM, is a disease affecting
the nervous system of many breeds both large and small. Classically affecting the spinal cord,
the degeneration progresses causing loss of limb function from hind to front limbs (Averill 1973,
Coates and Wininger 2010). Based on the SOD1 gene mutation the disease has many similarities
to Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, also known as Lou Gehring’s Disease, a degenerative
neurologic disease present in humans (Awano et al. 2009). Canine DM can serve as a model for
ALS. With DM now being recognized as an important disease affecting dogs of many breeds, it
is important to understand the cause to limit its genetic spread in future generations of dogs
(Fiszdon et al. 2020).
There is no gender predisposition in DM, but age has a role as DM typically affects dogs
in the later stages of their lives, around the age of 9 years in large dogs and 11 years in smaller
breeds like the Pembroke Welsh Corgi (Coates et al. 2007). The earliest clinical signs include
incoordination and hindlimb weakness (Averill 1973, Coates and Wininger 2010). General
proprioceptive ataxia refers to a dog’s inability to recognize limb position and posture, and this
symptom is also characteristic of DM. As the disease progresses, the dog loses fecal and
urination control, along with losing muscle mass and limb strength. If the dog becomes
paraplegic and is not euthanized, the weakness ascends to the forelimbs and eventually the dog
becomes tetraplegic (Coates and Wininger 2010). Once the disease reaches the dog’s brain, the
dog will struggle to even swallow or bark, and the condition is terminal with respiratory failure
(Awano et al. 2009, Coates and Wininger 2010, Ogawa et al. 2013).
The main cause of DM is genetic with a mutation in the SOD1 gene ( SOD1 ) (Awano et
al. 2009). This stands for superoxide dismutase (SOD), and the 1 refers to the version of this
enzyme found in the cytoplasm of the cell. When this gene is not copied correctly, or mutates, it
can cause changes in the proteins that are coded by the gene, and these changes can in turn result
in cell death, specifically of neurons and supporting cells (Fiszdon et al. 2020). For dogs with the
mutated version of the gene, homozygous recessive individuals have the greatest risk of disease
while heterozygous individuals have a decreased risk of DM. Homozygous refers to an organism
having two copies of the mutated allele for the same version of a gene, while heterozygous refers
to an organism having one mutated allele. While the presence of a mutated allele can indicate a
likelihood of disease, there may be other genes or modifying genes that may also result in the
disease phenotype or expressed trait. Additionally, not all homozygotes develop clinical disease,
so the presence of the mutated allele indicates a risk for developing DM (Coates and Wininger
2010, Fiszdon et al. 2020).
In light of the genetic factors involved in DM, genetic testing has become a point of
interest in its study. Genetic testing will complement other antemortem diagnostics for DM.
Most DM-affected dogs are homozygous for the mutant allele . Thus, homozygosity for the
mutant SOD1 allele is a major risk factor for canine DM. However, many dogs homozygous for
this mutation do not develop clinical signs. The age at onset for many dogs has exceeded the
mean life expectancy of dogs indicating that DM has an age-related, incomplete penetrance
mode of inheritance. DM has also been histopathologically confirmed in few heterozygous dogs
of certain breeds (Zeng et al. 2014). The occurrence of DM in a heterozygote seems plausible
since most human SOD1 mutations cause dominant ALS.
A second SOD1 mutation that was homozygous in an affected Bernese Mountain dog
was identified, and this mutant allele appears to be restricted to the Bernese Mountain Dog
breed, where it is less common than the first mutant allele described. Affected homozygotes in
other breeds have not yet been discovered. This finding serves as a reminder that direct DNA
tests indicate the presence or absence of disease-causing alleles but cannot be used to rule-out a
diagnosis because other sequence variants in the same gene or in a different gene might produce
a similar disease phenotype (Wininger et al. 2012).
As a result of this ambiguity, the diagnosis of DM is generally one of exclusion, meaning
that other diseases must be ruled out first before DM can be diagnosed with certainty. Generally,
differential diagnoses include intervertebral disc herniation, cancer of the spine or spinal cord,
and other mimicking compressive spinal cord diseases. These may be ruled out by imaging
methods such as spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). An important step in obtaining
an appropriate diagnosis is to have a dog with clinical signs be evaluated by a board-certified
veterinary neurologist ( www.acvim.org ; then go to find a specialist ). Signs of orthopedic disease
can be confused with neurologic diseases. A proprioceptive placement test, where the foot is
placed such that the paw is positioned knuckled over, is an important diagnostic tool. If the dog
can quickly recognize that its foot has been mispositioned, then the signs of limb dysfunction
may be orthopedic. DM can only be definitively diagnosed by histopathology of the spinal cord,
which is performed by autopsy examination (Coates and Wininger 2010). DM is characterized
by degeneration of the axons (processes carrying electrical transmission) and secondary loss of
the myelin sheaths (insulation) that wrap around the axons. Another key feature is astroglial
proliferation, which is most severe in the lateral and dorsal columns (Averill 1973, March et al.
2009). Neuron loss occurs in terminal disease (Ogawa et al. 2014). A veterinary pathologist is
able to discern these characteristics on a post mortem examination to establish a diagnosis of DM
(Coates and Wininger 2010).
Physical rehabilitation may improve the dog’s quality of life as the disease progresses.
Dogs who received physiotherapy survived longer on average than those who did not, an average
of 255 days and 55 days respectively, and these passive and active exercises were tailored to the
dog’s disease progression (Kathmann et al. 2006). Studies surrounding the impact of diet have
been performed, but it was concluded that there is no definitive evidence of improvement over
the treatment of physical therapy alone. Caution must be taken when facilitating any sort of
exercise therapy as the already weakened muscles can be easily damaged and fatigued, which
may increase the rate of disease progression (Polizopoulou et al. 2008).
In connection to research surrounding the human disease ALS, therapeutic models are
being investigated in dogs. Since the SOD1 mutation is important in both ALS and DM, canine
DM serves as a model for disease translation (Awano et al. 2009, Fiszdon et al. 2020). As a
result, studies are being conducted surrounding silencing the SOD1 gene and observing its effect
on the mobility of dogs affected with DM (Story et al. 2020). While these studies are in their
early stages, there is a possibility of successfully applying a canine disease model to ALS, with
benefits for both humans suffering from ALS and dogs suffering from DM (Coates and Wininger
2010).
Since there are currently no effective treatments for DM, breeders perform genetic testing
to mitigate transmission of the risk mutation to offspring. If a risk factor for DM is discovered
early, it allows the owner to be more responsible in the management of their breeding program.
Since the mutant allele is known to be present in over 180 purebred and mixed breeds, it is
important to be aware of its wide presence in the canine population. Research to find treatments
and study DM is being led by Dr. Joan R. Coates at the University of Missouri Veterinary Health
Center and other researchers worldwide. Laboratories are studying ways to diagnose and
measure disease progression with similar diagnostic modalities used in ALS patients. The
diseased tissues also are studied at all stages of progression. The nervous system tissue may be
harvested after the dog’s death by a necropsy (Coates and Wininger 2010). Spinal cord tissue
will also be retained for research purposes for other DM and ALS researchers in hopes of
understanding the molecular and genetic spectrum of this disease. The first step is to
characterize and document canine DM in the Mastiff.
Key References:
Averill DJ. (1973) Degenerative myelopathy in the aging German Shepherd dog: clinical and
pathologic findings. J Am Vet Med Assoc 162:1045-1051.
Awano T, Johnson GS, Wade C, Katz ML, et al. (2009) Genome-wide association analysis
reveals a SOD1 mutation in canine degenerative myelopathy that resembles amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:2794-2799.
Coates JR, March PA, Ogelsbee M, et al. (2007) Clinical characterization of a familial
degenerative myelopathy in Pembroke Welsh Corgi dogs. J Vet Intern Med
21(6):1323-1331.
Coates JR, Wininger FA. (2010) Canine degenerative myelopathy. Vet Clin North Am Small
Anim
Pract 40:929-950.
Fiszdon K, Gruszcynska J, Siewruk K. (2020) Canine Degenerative Myelopathy – pathogenesis,
current diagnostics possibilities and breeding implications regarding genetic testing. Acta
Sci. Pol. Zootechnica 19(1): 3-10.
Kathmann I, Cizinauskas S, Doherr MG, et al. (2006) Daily controlled physiotherapy increases
survival time in dogs with suspected degenerative myelopathy. J Vet Intern Med
20:927-932.
March PA, Coates JR, Abyad R, et al. (2009) Degenerative myelopathy in 18 Pembroke Welsh
corgi dogs. Vet Pathol 49:241-250.
Morgan BR, Coates JR, Johnson GC, Bujnak AC, Katz ML. (2013) Characterization of
Intercostal Muscle Pathology in Canine Degenerative Myelopathy: A Disease Model for
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. J Neurosci Res 91:1639–1650.
Morgan BR, Coates JR, Johnson GC, Shelton GD, Katz ML. (2014) Characterization of
Thoracic Motor and Sensory Neurons and Spinal Nerve Roots in Canine Degenerative
Myelopathy, a Potential Disease Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. J Neurosci
Res . 92: 531–541.
Polizopoulou ZS, Koutinas AF, Patsikas MN, et al. (2008) Evaluation of a proposed therapeutic
protocol in 12 dogs with tentative degenerative myelopathy. Acta Vet Hung. 56(3):
293-301.
Ogawa M, Uchida K, Yamato O, et al. (2013) Neuronal Loss and Decreased GLT-1 Expression
Observed in the Spinal Cord of Pembroke Welsh Corgi Dogs With Canine Degenerative
Myelopathy. Vet Path 51(3):591-602.
Story BD, Miller ME, Bradbury AM, et al. (2020) Canine Models of Inherited Musculoskeletal
and Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front. Vet. Sci. 7: 80.
Wininger FA, Zeng R, Johnson GS, et al. Degenerative myelopathy in a Bernese mountain dog
with a novel SOD1 missense mutation. J Vet Intern Med 2011;25:1166-1170.
Zeng R, Coates JR, Johnson GC, Hansen L, Awano T, Kolicheski A, et al. (2014) Breed
Distribution of SOD1 Alleles Previously Associated with Canine Degenerative
Myelopathy J Vet Intern Med 28:515.